| March 31 2005 |
Okay -- the day has arrived!
I mentioned in an earlier post that I will be moving my blog to a new location. That day has arrived and the address is as follows:
The Parchment
http://parchment.rtrc.net
When you get there you will see an initial post that will tell you a little about the site and how to use it. It is relatively simple so you should have no issues. If you do, please contact me.
Thanks!
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 5 : 26 pm | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: General
|
| | March 25 2005 |
Moving day approaches!
Lord willing I will be moving my online web journal at the end of this weekend. It will be hosted on my current domain (http://www.rtrc.net) and will allow for more customization as well as a sleeker, cleaner look. Readers of my web journal will also be able to "register" on this new site which will allow for more user interaction with the web journal.
As soon as the move is complete I will alert all of my readers via the email notification list as well as posting a link to the new site here. Of course the name of the site will remain the same as well as the address: (http://parchment.rtrc.net).
Stay tuned....
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 8 : 45 pm | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: General
|
| | March 19 2005 |
Pluriformity?
The image to the left is designed for one purpose: to confuse you. You see, this image is the family tree of the Presbyterian church in the United States. As you can see it is a convulted mess of schism and division with the occasional union of one branch to another, (a larger image is available by clicking it). What a mess! Ever since I was introduced to the Reformed Faith I have wondered one simple thing: Why are there so many reformed denominations in the United States?. You would think that since Presbyterians subscribe to the same doctrinal standards, (The Westminster Standards) that there would be little need of so many individual Presbyterian denominations. Yet there is the OPC, PCA, RPCNA, RPUS, RPCUS, CRC, ARP, and so many more. In this "alphabet soup" there is little unity except for the lip service of "fraternal relations" given by the leaders of these denominations. Frankly, this notion of lip service is incomplete because at the end of the day there is no real union at all. Consider the following comments written by John Frame:
Among the Reformers, Calvin was most concerned with the unity of the
church, specifically with the visible unity of the Protestant movement.
Resisting the tendency of Protestants to divide into Calvinist and Lutheran
camps, Calvin subscribed to a revised version of the Lutheran Augsburg
Confession. More recently, however, some Reformed thinkers have subscribed
to the notion of 'pluriformity', the view that denominations are, on the
whole, a good thing. On this view, denominations are God's way of dealing
with diversity in temperaments, gifts and doctrines. They maintain peace in
the body of Christ in the way that good fences make good neighbors.
Other Reformed theologians, however, have rejected pluriformity, believing
that God never ordained denominational division and that he intends for
differences among believers to be worked out within the church, not over
good fences. That position became more influential in the late twentieth
century. Reformed denominations have formed organizations, such as the
Reformed Ecumenical Synod, the International and American Councils of
Christian Churches, the World Reformed Fellowship and the National
Association of Presbyterian and Reformed Churches. They have sought
'fraternal' or 'sister church' relationships with other bodies. Some
denominations have discussed union with others.
It seems to me that, although Reformed churches are committed in theory to
seeking union, there is a notable tendency for them to shy away from any
actual union and indeed to create new divisions unnecessarily. Reformed
churches tend to glory in their distinctives: their history, their ethnic
origins, the theological battles of the past that have made them different
from others.
Further, when groups of people leave a denomination over some issue, they
tend to form new denominations rather than join denominations that already
exist. So those who left the CRC over the issue of women's ordination did
not, for the most part, join other Reformed or Presbyterian denominations,
but formed new bodies. In my judgement, these new denominations were
unjustified, and therefore add to the divisions in the body of Christ.
So why the need of so many Reformed denominations? Most people of a Reformed flavor would readily agree and argue that the best expression of God's church on earth is found within the Reformed Theological system. This system is expressed in the governmental paradigm of Presbyterianism. Again, most Reformed people would agree that Presbyterianism is the most accurate expression of Chirst's church on earth. Consider what the PCA Book of Church Order says:
The scriptural form of church government, which is representative or presbyterian...This scriptural doctrine of Presbytery is necessary to the perfection of the order of the visible Church (PCA Book of Church Order Chapter 1.1 and 1.6)
Read more of this article...
With that said, most if not all American Presbyterian denominations find their standards in those of the Westminster Assembly, namely the Westminster Standards. All of the elders, (teaching and ruling) are required to adhere to these standards when they take their ordination vows. Simply put, those churches find their standards in the same theological system no matter what denomination they find themsleves. If one were to take a piece of paper and draw a line down the middle and on the left side of this line list those things that are agreeable and on the right those things that are not I think we would find that there are far more things to agree with. It is those things on the right side of the line that cause this disunity and it is those things that need to be examined and debated with the goal being unity and not seperation. Why can't the denominations of the OPC and the PCA, for example, seek to unite under the same theological system and standard (The Westminster Standards)? What would actually happen if they sought to unite with the express goal to deal with those things that currently divide them? Certainly it would spark greater "official" debate and discussion of these matters with the encompassing mandate that all involved would submit to the will of the brethern just as they do now in their individual presbyteries and sessions. Yet most people believe this will never happen and I believe the reason is plain: Sinful pride. We are more interested in our "theological distinctives" then in true unity founded upon our one Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. We are more interested in squabbling over what divides us instead of being as the Westminster Divines and uniting with the goal of solving those things that currently divide us with the rule of the day being submission to the brethren. As long as we continue this way of thinking (on purpose or not) we will never impact a world we say we are so concerned to impact. In this way we are a disgrace to our most precious faith we say we love. We must not ignore our differances! We must work together to resolve them and seek the peace and purity as well as the unity of the Church of our Lord Jesus Christ. May God help us....
Read less...
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 3 : 49 pm | Leave a note {1} | E-Mail entry
Category: Theological:Church
|
| | March 16 2005 |
Interesting Article
As a result of the numerous email lists that I frequent I occasionally come across something of interest in those emails. This particular item comes on the heels of some lengthy discussion that I have had regarding the subject of ecclesiology (The study of the Church) and the implications that carries. This article may be of some interest to my readers and I commend it to you for your perusal and thought.
A Rejection of My Ordination by Dr. C. Matthew McMahon
Printer friendly version in Word 2003 format (downloadable 90.0 KB)
Some interesting snippets from this article are offered below.
Read more of this article...
I affirm the Presbyterian form of church government believing that system to be demonstrated in the Scriptures, both by the foundational Old Testament ideas held therein, the accounts of the Gospels, the early church in Acts, as well as the epistles. I reject all forms of Independency as schismatic, and as dissenting from Christ’s Church. This does not mean that I believe all Christians who are part of a Baptist congregation or Independent congregation are not saved, or heretical, or totally apostate. Rather, it does mean that I believe them to be in grave error as to church government, rejecting the lawful authority of Christ and His governmental rule over His Church. This brings specific consequences upon the lawful ordination of men in those churches, in opposition to the Presbyterian ordination seen as exercised in the Scriptures. (page 3)
If Presbyterianism is correct in its ecclesiology, then Independency is not correct, and thus, it is schismatic and dividing Christ’s Church. (page 3)
The Reformers, then, were not schismatics. Rather, as Rome indoctrinated an official position against the gospel, they withdrew from the true church that the Reformers were continuing to propagate under the Gospel. Those who were truly schismatic were the Roman Catholics. (page7)
Over this one Church there are officers, called pastors, teachers and deacons. These are expressly given authority to rule in their respective offices, the keys of which are given to pastors and teachers to govern the Church authoritatively under the headship of Christ’s authority. These men are ordained to office by lawful ordination. They say, “No man ought to take upon him the office of a minister of the word without a lawful calling.” This lawful calling is substantiated by the church, and then is approved by the presbytery of elders. They say, “Every minister of the word is to be ordained by imposition of hands, and prayer, with fasting, by those preaching presbyters to whom it doth belong.” The power of ordination does not rest in the hands of the congregation to vote a minister in or out, but rather in the hands of those whom Christ gave authority to lawfully ordain. Without this system, government becomes “suggestion” and overthrows the authority of Christ to rule His church through the ordained means He has given. (page 9)
This brings into question the following problem. Churches that function outside the prescribed governmental structure (the jure divino of Christ) are sectaries and schismatic from the Church of Christ. If the former principles are true (and I believe the Scriptures demonstrate them as true, as well as the demonstration of Scripture in the best Reformed Churches through history) then, 1) Independent Churches do not function as a biblical church and subsequently are not a particular congregations of the One established true Church, 2) the leadership is not biblically ordained (and so are taking up the duties of an elder without having the authority to do so - such as preaching and administering the sacraments illicitly), and 3) they cannot practice biblical church discipline, giving all power and right to the congregation instead of lawfully ordained ministers and ambassadors of Christ. Such an illicit office, as the Westminster Assembly concluded, is not to be tolerated. (page 12)
Independency attempts to apply the authority of the church from Christ to the church as a whole, instead of to the government of the church. (page 13)
Read less...
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 1 : 34 pm | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: Theological:Church
|
| | March 14 2005 |
Family Worship
As a result of a conversation I had Sunday with a good friend of mine (and a regular visitor to The Parchment) I decided to post a small entry regarding Family Worship. Most people would quickly state the absolute need of this in our daily lives. Yet, I am sure there are many who struggle with the "How's" of this practice. So, with that in mind, let me ask this question of my readers: What do you do for Family Worship? I would encourage my readers to share what they do so that others may benefit from it. Please be specific in your answers...
Here are some links regarding the subject:
The Covenant Family Fellowship
The Directory for Family Worship
John Knox on Family Worship
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 4 : 47 pm | Leave a note {3} | E-Mail entry
Category: Theological: General
|
| | March 13 2005 |
Web Poll
I am currently conducting a web poll. You can find the question and the choices on the sidebar to the right. You can only vote once and, as usual, you are able to comment on the poll.
Enjoy!
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 6 : 50 pm | Leave a note {1} | E-Mail entry
Category: General
|
|
New Picture Gallery
No! I am not bored. Read further to see WHY I have added this picture (or, if you simply cannot wait, you can click the image and go where it sends you). As you can see I have been in the mood to load new features and other interesting stuff to my online web journal. Now there is a image gallery that can be accessed by my readers. When you access this site you can subscribe by clicking on the "register" link in the upper right hand corner. You will receive a email that will include a link to complete the registration. This will give you greater flexibility and use of the site. The Parchment Gallery will include many differant albums and other interesting phote-related stuff. For instance, my daughters are going to Scotland this Summer and I am sure they will have some great pictures of that wonderful country. So...look for many pictures in the very near future. Until then you will have to live with the lone picture of myself (okay okay....it is a bad picture!!)
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 8 : 07 am | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: General
|
| | March 12 2005 |
New Feature
I have included a new feature for my web journal that will allow me to write lengthy articles (ya, I know you're thinking..."You talk to much already!"). At the bottom of this article you will see a link that says "Read more of this article". If you click on it (yes, do that now)...
Read more of this article...
...you will see the rest of the article. This feature will allow me to write longer articles without sacrificing space on the main page of the journal. If you want ot return the screen to the original length simply click the "Read less" link and you will see the article as it appeared when you first came to the site. Of course you can still comment on these articles as you have done in the past...
Enjoy!
Read less...
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 5 : 37 am | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: General
|
| | February 22 2005 |
The Days of our Life
Psa 102:11 My days are like a lengthened shadow, and I wither away like grass.
This morning I was pondering this verse and looking at it from the aspect that life is so short. When I look back through the corridor of my life I am amazed at how fast time has past. It seems like only yesterday when I was 18 and thought 38 was old. Now I am 38 and have a growing family. Yet, that is not my concern. Since life is so short and since there is so little time what am I spending my time on? What are the priorities of my life and what am I doing to organize my day as to meet those priorities. Certainly as God's child I am called to prioritize everything under the banner of a holy life. For many this will mean different things but it must be a reality for all that name the name of the Lord God. If we were all honest we waste away a good deal of time each day. Time is so short and life is passing. What are you doing with the time that God has given you? What should you be doing and what are you willing to change to make that a reality?
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 6 : 07 am | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: Devotional
|
| | February 19 2005 |
Federal Vision
As some of you are aware there is a rather large controversy in some Reformed denominations in the United States. This matter involves the doctrine of justification which many of you know is the article upon which the Church stands or falls, (Luther). As a result of this controversy there is now a website designed exclusively for detailing the issue. It can be found at: http://www.paulperspective.com/.
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 6 : 29 am | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: Theological: General
|
| | February 13 2005 |
Unity?
For me this matter of church unity constantly resurfaces. I simply cannot escape the thoughts that daily fill my mind as I consider and examine this issue. As I reflect back through the corridor of time I often ask, "What happened?" In the United States there are, according to the World Christian Database 635 Christian denominations. It does not even mention those churches that are "non-denominational". How and why has the body of Christ become so divided? What has been the root cause of many of these divisions and creations of so many denominations? Certainly there are real times for separation both at the denominational and local level. This can certainly be discussed at length as to what those times are and I would welcome a forum for this exact purpose. Yet my gut level thinking tells me that so many of these "splits" and "separations" and other such divisions are and were unnecessary. Consider the matter that I have repeatedly written about here on this site. There is a new movement infecting churches all over this country. It is called Patriarchy and it is -- at the height of its practice - legalism. The question that is germane to this discussion is: Will this movement result in a new denomination? Has there been and will there continue to be unnecessary church splits and creations all across America as a result of this movement? Why are people so quick to start something new instead of working to resolve matters in a biblical way? I think the answer is plain. It is due to the sinful pride of man. We all want things our way. We all desire to see things happen as we think they should both in theology, doctrine and practice. In this discussion I am not dealing with core doctrines of a ecumenical flavor, (the so called "Ecumenical Creeds of Christianity" contained within the Apostles Creed, Nicene Creed, and the Athanasian Creed). Is the desire to see "non-essential matters" something that is worth dividing over and in that create a new denomination and/or new church? For that matter it might be necessary to discuss what would be considered a "non-essential matter" and what would be critical to solid orthodoxy (a venture I would be interested in being a part of). I am not sure what the answers are but I am sure that this matter of unity is not optional. It is not something that we can simply dismiss or ignore. I feel we are our own worst enemies. Consider the following quote:
...[S]urely the majority of Christian denominations, particularly the numerous subgroups into which most of the major branches of Protestantism have split, have been spawned at least as much by personal rivalry, animosity, and a spirit of intolerance, often along geographical or ethnic lines...Theological plurality has not been as much a problem as alienating behavior, a behavior which has developed a sense of uncompromising rectitude on the part of some people (Craig Blomberg, The NIV Application Commentary on 1 Corinthians, p. 47)
What I think the author is saying is that pride has fostered the vast majority of splits in the Protestant Church in the United States. We are an intolerant bunch. We cannot get our way so we leave. We refuse to listen to our brothers in matters. We act like enemies instead of family. Yet, we would never permit our children to act in the manner that some in the Church of Christ have acted. Instead of working to resolve our differences we stubbornly leave. I am not arguing that there are not legitimate issues that need to be deliberated. There are. The question is the manner in which we work to resolve these matters.
Further, we need to ascertain what constitutes a "fellowship breaking level event".
Furthermore, why is it that Presbyterian churches cannot fellowship and open lines of conversation with other denominational groups like Baptists or Methodists? Perhaps it is that same pride that stops us from communicating at some level. Pastors and elders should be talking and working together instead of arguing (or worse yet, ignoring one another) over "non-essential matters". The practical outworking of this are many but would include matters of church discipline and other such elements. Again, I would be interested in seeing this venture taken up.
Friends, we must not run away from this matter. We must realize that this is Christ's church. None of us have all the theological answers and none of us have it all figured out yet. I don't care if you are Presbyterian, Baptist or whatever. The command to be like-minded and to be in unity towards one another still remains. Furthermore, if God has placed you in a church then you are called to labor there as God enables you. Lastly, I would encourage the Christian community to begin to dialog about what matters are "essential" and thus help define those matters that will allow for greater unity.
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 4 : 44 pm | Leave a note {1} | E-Mail entry
Category: Theological:Church
|
|
Sabbath Day Thoughts
From John Murray:
The rest of the Sabbath is not idleness; it is activity in the sacred exercises of meditation, contemplation, and prayer. If we have this interest there is not a moment for weariness or boredom. The Sabbath day is not one minute too long for us. Is that not the Lord's witness to the people of old, and even more relevently to us? 'Call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the Lord, honourable...Then shalt though delight thyself in the Lord' (Isa. 58:13, 14). God's own rest is not that of idleness or inactivity. It is that of joy and satisfaction in the work He has wrought. So must ours be. (Collected Writings of John Murray, Volume 1, pp. 227-228)
Is this how we see the Sabbath? Is this our attitude as we come to it and as we prepare for it? Do we joy in this day as a day given to us by God as a reminder of His work? Perhaps we should be about the business of contemplating this aspect of the Sabbath and see it as a day of utter joy. It is a joyful thing to consider the completion of the Lord's work on the cross which culminated in His resurrection. We should be constantly filled with praise and awe.
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 6 : 59 am | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: Theological: The Lord's Day
|
| | February 08 2005 |
Sermon Recommendation
This past Lord's Day my pastor preached an excellent sermon from 1 Corinthians 1:10-17. It dealt with this matter of division and schism in the local church and he discussed that at the root of all such division is the sin of pride. It would be a good use of your time to listen to it and you may do so at Sermon Audio by clicking the link below:
1 Corinthians 1:10-17
Enjoy!
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 6 : 09 am | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: Sermon Recommendations
|
| | February 04 2005 |
Counterfeit Repentance
As is indicated on the sidebar of my blog I am currently reading the Puritan work, The Doctrine of Repentance by Thomas Watson. As is my custom, I am continuing to read the Puritans in my morning reading time. This quote from Watson caught my eye. It requires no further comment. It does require our contemplation.
If pain and trouble were sufficient to repentance, then the damned in hell should be most penitent, for they are most in anguish. Repentance depends upon a change of heart. There may be terror, yet with no change in heart.(Thomas Watson, The Doctrine of Repentance, p. 15, emphasis mine).
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 7 : 00 am | Leave a note {1} | E-Mail entry
Category: Devotional
|
|
Web Blog Recommendation
A very good personal friend of mine has a web blog that I commend to my readers. It is called Semper Ubi Sub Ubi (you Latin experts should be chuckling about now!). You can access it by following the link proivided below.
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Enjoy!
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 6 : 53 am | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: General
|
| | January 25 2005 |
Essential and Non-essential Disagreements
I was listening to a taped lecture given by John Frame on the unity of the church when, in his practical suggestions towards unity, he offered the following statement:
[We need to learn] how to distinguish essential from non-essential disagreements...what's the differance between an essential and non-essential disagreement? We need to get a clearer idea on that if we are going to somehow bring more unity into the church. (Auburn Avenue Pastors Conferance 2004)
Hoping he was going to offer some he does not. So, what would these be? How can we ascertain them? What are "essential" disagreements? What are "non-essential" disagreements?
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 4 : 56 pm | Leave a note {3} | E-Mail entry
Category: Theological:Church
|
| | January 23 2005 |
New Devotional Study Beginning
Starting Monday, January 23 I will be going through the Sermon on the Mount, (Matthew 5-7). There are a ton of practical elements contained within this sermon given by our Lord. I trust that it will be a benefit to my readers and help us all grow in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
Posted by William F Hill Jr at 7 : 24 am | Leave a note {0} | E-Mail entry
Category: Devotional: Sermon on the Mount
|
|
|
 |
|