Fragmenta
March 18 2008
WHY THE ECONOMY IS GOING BAD, AND WILL GO WORSE
The demise of Bear Stearns was reported today, though it had been predicted earlier. Perhaps the scariest line, to me, is this:
Every week, it seems, another part of the U.S. financial system falters and the federal government has to come up with a new rescue plan
Frederic Bastiat, as usual, has the diagnosis correct:
what advantage is there in institutions of credit? It is, that they facilitate, between borrowers and lenders, the means of finding and treating with each other; but it is not in their power to cause an instantaneous increase of the things to be borrowed and lent. And yet they ought to be able to do so, if the aim of the reformers is to be attained, since they aspire to nothing less than to place ploughs, houses, tools, and provisions in the hands of all those who desire them.

And how do they intend to effect this?

By making the State security for the loan.
This means Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the FDIC.
And the Socialists rub their hands, and say, "See how well our plan has answered. Thanks to the intervention of the State, poor James has a plough. He will no longer be obliged to dig the ground; he is on the road to make a fortune. It is a good thing for him, and an advantage to the nation as a whole."

Indeed, gentlemen, it is no such thing; it is no advantage to the nation, for there is something behind which is not seen.

It is not seen, that the plough is in the hands of James, only because it is not in those of John.

It is not seen, that if James farms instead of digging, John will be reduced to the necessity of digging instead of farming.

That, consequently, what was considered an increase of loan, is nothing but a displacement of loan. Besides, it is not seen that this displacement implies two acts of deep injustice.

It is an injustice to John, who, after having deserved and obtained credit by his honesty and activity, sees himself robbed of it.

It is an injustice to the tax-payers, who are made to pay a debt which is no concern of theirs.
Government interference with the credit market -- including mortgages -- is unjust.
Posted by Matt at 11 : 01 am | Leave a note {0}
February 10 2008
SHUSTER GETS HIS
I am not disappointed at this at all. Shuster's treatment of Ron Paul was abominable: he'd ask him a stupid question full of insinuated insult, and while Paul sliced it up expertly and handed it back to him, Shuster's face would be adorned with a little smirk that said, "Right. Isn't Ron Paul a hoot?"
Posted by Matt at 6 : 36 am | Leave a note {1}
February 02 2008
WHY DOES ANYONE VOTE FOR THIS LIAR?
Does no one do any research?



McCain is a mere political opportunist with no principles.

Stop letting the talking heads on television tell you who to vote for. Do a little legwork and discover what revolting persons these candidates are.
Posted by Matt at 4 : 56 pm | Leave a note {7}
January 30 2008
THE ONLY FISCAL CONSERVATIVE IN THE RACE
The National Taxpayers' Union points out that Ron Paul is the only candidate who would cut government spending:
According to the report, Congressman Paul’s proposals would cut government spending by over $150 billion, a conservative estimate of the spending reductions Dr. Paul has proposed. The report concludes that the other remaining Republican candidates, Mitt Romney, John McCain and Mike Huckabee, have proposed spending increases of $19.5 billion, $6.9 billion and $54 billion respectively.
Posted by Matt at 10 : 28 pm | Leave a note {0}
ASTOUNDING MEDIA BIAS
I eagerly await the statistics on the latest CNN Republican presidential debate. Anderson Cooper made it into an utter farce, giving McCain and Romney an absurd preponderance of the time, and cutting Ron Paul off three times. He'd have cut him off even more times, but you can't cut someone off if you don't call on him in the first place.

Huckabee also got the cold shoulder from the moderator. At one point, Paul and Huckabee looked at each other and threw up their hands.

The old media can enjoy it for the moment. But I believe this is might be the very last presidential election that they will be able to manipulate in this way. For one thing, a lot more people are going to see the following 2-minute clip of Ron Paul's best moment than will sit through the full 90 minutes of Romney and McCain blathering at each other:

Posted by Matt at 9 : 58 pm | Leave a note {0}
January 26 2008
WHO DO WE THINK WE ARE?
From this story about the Iranian speedboat incident in the Strait of Hormuz:
The US military had also mis-read Iranian radio communications in the past, most notably in 1988 when the USS Vincennes, an American guided missile cruiser, mistakenly shot down an Iranian civilian airliner over the Strait of Hormuz, killing all 290 passengers and crew.
Now, that was 20 years ago, but it is still telling. I was 12 years old when this happened, so perhaps that's why I didn't know about it. But now that I do, I think it's outrageous. If some other nation had shot down one of our airliners, we'd have gone to war against them, and we'd have military bases in their country to this day. 290 passengers killed??! By the official military, not terrorists?

Read the Wikipedia article on the incident.

One of my favorite students mentioned to me that our military can reach any place in the world in 2 hours. Yep. Those 290 Iranian Air passengers sure had some power projected on them, alright. When we have our military stationed all over the world, and when our weaponry kills at a distance like a video game, this sort of thing is inevitable. Recall Pres. Clinton's bombing of the Al-Shifa pharmaceutical plant in 1998 on "faulty intelligence."

An entire generation of Americans has been desensitized to this sort of thing. We have been doing it for so long that it seems normal. And besides, "we're the good guys."

This is why I shudder every time I hear Sean Hannity on the radio catechizing his callers with "You're a great American." It is too close to "Deutschland über alles." Criticism of our foreign policy is falsely equated with hatred of America. Anything and everything we do is now justified in the name of Sept. 11, 2001. (Hunting down and killing Osama Bin Laden and his associates was justified, but we didn't get it done.) We are prepared to accept or at least overlook actions from our own government that we would condemn if they were done by any other nation. Can you imagine if China bombed an American factory or shot down an American airliner "by mistake" -- let alone invading our nation and toppling our government because they thought we were getting more weapons than we ought to, or because they judged our leaders to be evil, or because they thought we might be a military threat to them in the future, or because someone from Canada or Mexico had committed an act of terrorism in China?

We need to repent.
Posted by Matt at 11 : 00 pm | Leave a note {4}
January 24 2008
BUSINESS AS USUAL IN LOUISIANA
Ron Paul's campaign calls the LA GOP on their shenanigans.
Posted by Matt at 4 : 57 pm | Leave a note {1}
January 22 2008
INTERESTING EXPLANATION RE IRAN
This article was an interesting explanation for why our government is putting so much pressure on Iran. I doubt it's the whole explanation, but it's probably a large part of the reason.
Posted by Matt at 7 : 29 am | Leave a note {3}
January 21 2008
WHOLESOME REMINDER ABOUT TRUE POLITICS
Thanks to Toby for posting this timely reminder about the Lord's Supper and our true party affiliation:
"Yes, cast your votes, be god fearing citizens of the land, seek the welfare of your nation. But remember that this meal is a far more effective political tool than all the lawn signs and bumper stickers of the world."
Posted by Matt at 10 : 17 pm | Leave a note {0}
January 16 2008
STILL STEALING RON PAUL'S POSITIONS
Remember when Huckabee suggested in a televised debate that he wants to "eliminate the IRS"?

Well, now it seems he wants to leave smoking laws to local governments and keep the Feds out of it.

But even if he adopts all the rest of Paul's positions, I still won't vote for him. Character matters.
Posted by Matt at 8 : 49 pm | Leave a note {0}
January 10 2008
THE ACTUAL FINANCIAL SITUATION OF THE UNITED STATES
Glenn Beck interviews David Walker, the Comptroller General of the USA.



As Glenn Beck notes, Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who will save us from this disaster. Is it any wonder that young people -- whose future is being ruined by our government's spending -- vote for him?
Posted by Matt at 8 : 46 am | Leave a note {3}
January 07 2008
LEGO AD FOR RON PAUL
This was the cutest ad I've seen in awhile. I especially liked the "print more money" screen on the Fed's PC.

Posted by Matt at 5 : 50 pm | Leave a note {0}
January 06 2008
RON PAUL EXPLAINS HIS POSITIONS...
without the Old Media telling him he only has 30 seconds to respond. Watch the New Hampshire Town Hall Presidential Forum that he did while the five anointed candidates exchanged petty jabs and put-downs on FOX without the sanction of the New Hampshire GOP. Paul answers tough questions at length.



Posted by Matt at 11 : 04 pm | Leave a note {3}
January 03 2008
THINLY VEILED PARABLE
From DailyPaul:

"Suppose coyotes attacked killing two of my calves. I went to our county commissioners for help. Their response was to borrow 10 million dollars, buy two farms (thru eminent domain, at less than market price of course), increase every ones taxes 20% to pay interest to hostile bankers, and ask all the farmers to donate one calf per year. They then put the calves on tethers and hire sharpshooters to kill any coyotes that attack the calves. They also begin building an elaborate research farm instructing farmers on how to grow pineapples instead of cattle. One of the commissioners used to grow pineapples in his kitchen window.. Some problems arise. They spend a lot more money the next five years in court battling the aggrieved farmers that they took the land from. The other county farmers are afraid to say anything else about coyotes because they might get more “help”. The coyotes learn to attack the tethered calves anyway and the other farmers and I still lose calves to coyotes. The pineapples don’t grow very well because this isn’t Hawaii."

"Then during the next election Ron Paul runs on a platform of selling the farms back to the farmers, letting the farmers decide what to grow, paying off the bankers, reducing the taxes, letting farmers keep their calves, getting our pineapples from Hawaii and giving the sharpshooters $100/coyote and telling them to go help the farmers. The other politicians call him a kook who wants to surrender the war on coyotes. Who are you voting for?"
Posted by Matt at 7 : 17 am | Leave a note {3}
December 17 2007
SHAMELESS APPEAL
Posted by Matt at 11 : 41 pm | Leave a note {8}
RON PAUL'S STATEMENT OF FAITH
This statement from Ron Paul should give pause to anyone who is supporting a certain other candidate who wraps himself in Christ's name and claims to have a theology degree. Paul is concerned to be true to his God rather than loud about Him, quietly and faithfully serving the people who elected him to Congress.

When John McCain says that "Ron Paul is the most honest man in Congress", it means that Ron Paul bears a terrific testimony for Christ without saying a word.

Posted by Matt at 7 : 41 pm | Leave a note {4}
TEA PARTY
A blog-note of thanks to all the friends who came to our Ron Paul tea party yesterday. I was especially delighted to see my former students, Luke, Betsy, and Grace, and the parents of many of my present and future students.

I especially liked hearing from two parents of grammar school students. One is the father of one of Aedan's classmates. He's a criminal investigator, and says that when he watches the candidates, Ron Paul comes across as transparently telling the truth, while all the others have some number of the indicators that, even if not fibbing, they are shaping their message to make themselves look good.

Another made my day by saying he'd removed the Huckabee bumpersticker from his car. (You know who you are. Let me know if you'd like a Ron Paul replacement for it!)



Sora and I stayed up until midnight watching to see if the campaign would break $18 million for the quarter. With 10 minutes to go, there was only 20 thousand lacking. In the previous 10 minutes, more than $100K had come in. It's mind-boggling to think of that much money in that short a time.
Posted by Matt at 1 : 28 pm | Leave a note {1}
December 13 2007
RON PAUL THE BEST PRO-LIFE CANDIDATE
I was asked today whether Ron Paul supports the death penalty. Having searched RonPaulLibrary.com, I found this marvelous statement criticizing the Victims of Unborn Violence Act.

In it, Dr. Paul criticizes the proposed bill for inconsistency: it imposes criminal penalties for those who cause wilful harm or death to an unborn child, except abortionists. Further, even for non-abortionists who kill unborn babies, the act stipulates that the killer cannot be subjected to the death penalty. Dr. Paul comments, "With respect to only the fetus, the bill exempts the murderer from the death sentence--yet another diminution of the unborn's personhood status and clearly a violation of the equal protection clause." Hear that? Dr. Paul rightly sees abortion as unconstitutional, a violation of the 14th Amendment.

He concludes:
Protection of life (born or unborn ) against initiations of violence is of vital importance. So vitally important, in fact, it must be left to the States' criminal justice systems. We have seen what a legal, constitutional, and philosophical mess results from attempts to federalize such an issue. Numerous States have adequately protected the unborn against assault and murder and done so prior to the Federal Government's unconstitutional sanctioning of violence in the Roe v. Wade decision. Unfortunately, H.R. 503 ignores the danger of further federalizing that which is properly reserved to State governments and, in so doing, throws legal philosophy, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the insights of Chief Justice Rehnquist out with the baby and the bathwater.
He says similar things, more succinctly, in this article.
Posted by Matt at 9 : 40 pm | Leave a note {0}
December 10 2007
FREEDOM
What does the word mean? Ron Paul explains. And his answer is the same as that of our founding fathers.
Posted by Matt at 7 : 20 am | Leave a note {10}
December 05 2007
NUKE IRAN?
I am just flabbergasted by these pro-war Republican candidates.

Duncan Hunter: "I would authorize the use of tactical nuclear weapons if there was no other way to preempt those particular centrifuges."

Giuliani: "I think it could be done with conventional weapons, but you can't rule out anything and you shouldn't take any option off the table."

Mitt Romney: "You can’t take options off the table."

Mike Huckabee: "Whatever it takes. We cannot allow Iran to have nuclear capacity. It’s as simple as that."

These men are willing to entertain the idea of a pre-emptive strike against a nation that has not attacked us. They are even willing to entertain the idea of using nuclear weapons against Iran. Why?

I don't understand it. Do these men really have principled reasons for such appalling statements? Or, in the absence of principle, do they really believe that Americans want to be known as nuclear aggressors?

Where did they get this line about "not taking options off the table"? Could it be from Hillary Clinton's speech at the annual AIPAC in February, when she said "U.S. policy must be clear and unequivocal: We cannot, we should not, we must not permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons,'' Clinton told the crowd of Israel supporters. "In dealing with this threat ... no option can be taken off the table.''

Obama and John Edwards talk the same line.

I no longer bother to distinguish in my mind between these Republicans and Democrats.

Meanwhile, Ron Paul has been proven right again and again about foreign policy, and he has been saying the same thing for decades. He predicted all the problems that we now have in Iraq. But then, he wasn't the only one:



Ron Paul's press release on Iran yesterday: "We needlessly and foolishly threaten Iran even though they have no nuclear weapons. I find it incomprehensible that as the failure of our Iraq policy becomes more evident, some want the same kind of policy toward Iran. A policy of peace, trade and diplomacy, is superior."
Posted by Matt at 11 : 20 pm | Leave a note {18}
December 04 2007
WHY I DON'T BELIEVE THE POLLS
The mainstream media continues to recite polls that have Ron Paul in "single digits" and proclaim that he "has no chance."

Meanwhile, there are reports of other candidates' fundraisers, speeches, and rallies being gatecrashed by crowds of Ron Paul supporters.

(Thanks to Bradford Zink for the photoshopped graphic.)

In like fashion, after being given barely any time to speak at the CNN/YouTube debate (and being pitched booby-trapped questions like "What punishment should be given to women who get abortions?" and "Since you have no chance, will you run as an independent?")... Ron Paul met 800 of his supporters and addressed them for half an hour. The NY Times blogger "The Caucus" reported that
By land, by air and by sea, the disciples of Ron Paul converged on the debate hall here in St. Petersburg, Fla., in the hours before the debate here tonight. There were two planes circling overhead, one flying a Ron Paul banner, another with lights spelling out his name Goodyear Blimb-style. A ship circling in the bay just outside the hall was festooned with Ron Paul paraphernalia, blaring martial music. In the park, just beyond the security fences erected around The Mahaffey Theater, the Paulites outfitted a group that was decidedly young and decidedly loyal with shirts and stickers and other assorted Paul gear.

The outsized presence of Mr. Paul’s supporters is not unusual. It seems that no matter which Republican candidate I am covering, the Paul people seem to find a way to their events. Sometimes it is a lone man with a sign, other times more organized. But come they do.
I look at my own situation: I am tremendously excited about Ron Paul, in a way I have never been about any other politician. I've never voted in a primary before, but I'm sure going to vote in this one.

I am making an invitation for a tea party open house on the 16th to support Ron Paul. While putting the invitation together tonight, I went online to get some graphics. I went to google and entered "Ron Paul graphics". I got a big listof different sites offering web graphics made by fellow Paul supporters.

I then tried the same search for "Rudy Giuliani graphics", "Mitt Romney graphics", and "Mike Huckabee graphics". Nothing for any of them. No grassroots support. No one enthusiastic enough to make advertising materials for them on the web.

And then I ask myself: who is likely to turn out to vote? People some pollster calls on a telephone? Or people who are really hyped up about their candidate?

Now, I could be wrong. Maybe Paul will lose. But the mainstream media sure hasn't given me any reason to think so.
Posted by Matt at 10 : 44 pm | Leave a note {0}
December 03 2007
FOR REPUBLICANS WHO FEAR PAUL'S FOREIGN POLICY
I have met a few friends of mine who think Ron Paul sounds good, but have reservations about his policy on Iraq. Rather than explain why I find him more persuasive than the Bush administration, I thought I would reproduce an article by David Beito and Scott Horton.

Why Ron Paul Is Right About Terrorism: A Letter to the GOP Base

by David T. Beito and Scott Horton
by David T. Beito and Scott Horton


DIGG THIS

"Policy toward Iraq is ... not designed to protect U.S. national security. It is instead a threat to our security because it may lead to war and loss of American lives, increase terrorism and certainly an additional expense for the U.S. taxpayer. The hyped rhetoric coming from Washington which describes Hussein as the only evil monster with which we must deal in the world is a poor substitute for wise counsel. "

~ Rep. Ron Paul, Letter to President Bill Clinton, November 19, 1997

"If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road."

~ Gov. George W. Bush, Presidential debate with Al Gore, October 3, 2000

Many conservatives have said that they agree with Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul on just about everything, but they just can't see things his way when it comes to dealing with the Middle East. Paul's views – correctly or incorrectly perceived – could well be a deal breaker for some in the base of the Republican party who look for strong presidential leadership to protect us from foreign threats. This open letter is an attempt to persuade you that Paul has been, and continues to be, right about the terrorist threat and what should be done about it.

More... (3274 words)
Posted by Matt at 4 : 55 pm | Leave a note {0}
December 02 2007
RON PAUL VS. THE GREED OF THE AMA
Ron Paul has it nailed again:
We deliver a lot of services in this country through the free market, and when you do it through the free market prices go down. But in medicine, prices go up. Technology doesn't help the cost, it goes up instead of down. But if you look at almost all of our industries that are much freer, technology lowers the prices. Just think of how the price of cell phones goes down. Poor people have cell phones, and televisions, and computers. Prices all go down. But in medicine, they go up, and there's a reason for that, that's because the government is involved with it... For instance, if you have a sore throat and you have to come see me, you have to wait in the waiting room, and then get checked, and then get a prescription, and it ends up costing you $100. If you had true competition, you should be able to go to a nurse, who could for 1/10 the cost very rapidly do it, and let her give you a prescription for penicillin. See, the doctors and the medical profession have monopolized the system through licensing. And that's not an accident, because they like the idea that you have to go see the physician and pay this huge price. And patients can sort this out, they're not going to go to a nurse if they need brain surgery... (From a New Hampshire Public Radio interview, which you can listen to here.
On a similar note, Rick Saenz has been blogging about Paul Starr's The Social Transformation of American Medicine. This post was helpful.

The unfreeness of the medical market is also directly behind the AMA's organized prosecution and persecution of midwives in this country. For more on that, see the Ohio Families for Safe Birth webpage, and especially the article on why midwifery legislation is necessary in order to preserve our freedom to give birth at home.

When asked in a meeting what he thought of out-of-hospital birth, Ron Paul once again comes down on the side of the angels.

In his own medical practice, Dr. Paul refused to accept Medicare and Medicaid payments, preferring to serve his patients for free. There is not a gram of hypocrisy in the man.
Posted by Matt at 3 : 36 pm | Leave a note {13}
December 01 2007
HOPE FOR AMERICA
Tears came to my eyes when I watched this one.



This man is just so very good. (Yeah, Don McLean didn't help matters any either.) But what chokes me up the most is the thought that if he loses, we'll have more of the same corruption and business-as-usual. That would be a tragedy. But if he wins, I'll cry then too, because it'll be too good to be true.

For those who aren't interested in politics, or in the 2008 Presidential race, I apologize. I just haven't encountered any politician before whom I actually admired. Super Tuesday (and next November?) will come and go. I'll weep some more, win or lose, and then things will be back to wretched normal.

Ron Paul reminds me a great deal of Walter Brueggemann's Prophetic Imagination. When the status quo -- the "royal consciousness" -- is bankrupt, and cannot deliver on its promises, the first job of the true prophet is to weep and denounce it. His second job is to offer hope.

Posted by Matt at 6 : 35 pm | Leave a note {2}
November 29 2007
RON PAUL ON THE WAR IN IRAQ
I have several times seen Ron Paul called an isolationist. To quote another Paul supporter, that is like calling your neighbor a hermit just because he doesn't heave bricks through your windows or drive his car in circles on your lawn.

The war in Iraq is incredibly unpopular right now. And it has not made us safer. It has, rather, provoked more hostility and won us more enemies than we had before we invaded.

Five years ago, Ron Paul asked 35 questions about the Iraq war. They're as unanswerable today as they were then.
Posted by Matt at 10 : 13 pm | Leave a note {2}
November 24 2007
RON PAUL BLIMP
This is a tremendous campaign advertising idea. Chip in a few bucks and help make it happen! (Click on the photo to read more.)



(I told Sora that Ron Paul's campaign is fundamentally different from the campaigns of the other candidates. He is essentially just along for the ride while his supporters do the campaigning. He did nothing to make the record-breaking $4 million-in-a-single-day happen on November 5th. He isn't orchestrating the Dec. 16th Tea Party that will surely break that record. And as for the blimp: the webpage just went up today, and already the contributions are 1/6th of the way to the price tag of the blimp rental! The other candidates can only wish they had followers this motivated and imaginative.)
Posted by Matt at 5 : 41 pm | Leave a note {12}
CONSCRPTION
"In America conscription is unknown; men are induced to enlist for pay. Compulsory recruitment is so contrary to the conceptions and alien to the habits of the people of the United States that I doubt whether anyone would ever dare to bring in such a law." - Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1835), p. 222.

Well, sorry to break it to you, Alexis, but someone does dare.

One of the reasons to support Ron Paul for president is his opposition to the draft, which you can read here. It is shocking to realize that there were actually 14 or 15 congressmen willing to sponsor House Resolution 163, instituting a mandatory period of military service for all Americans "including women."
Posted by Matt at 10 : 37 am | Leave a note {2}
November 21 2007
"NOBODY DOES IT BETTER"? OH REALLY?
Yesterday was the "money bomb" day for Mike Huckabee's campaign, as they attempted to reach $1 million by the 20th of November. Fox News reported the story here in glowing terms, finding a poll that shows Huck close to Romney in Iowa, and stating that the Arkansas governor "received $1,043,496.41 in donations in the first 20 days of November."

There was a concession at the end of the article:
In appealing for broader online financial support, Huckabee could be looking to follow in the footsteps of dark horse candidate Ron Paul, even though Paul has demonstrated the ability to raise far more money. The Republican Texas congressman pulled in $4.3 million Nov. 5, considered a one-day online record for a GOP candidate.
What Fox did not report is the fact that Ron Paul's supporters spontaneously decided to compete with Mike Huckabee's planned big day.

Around 2:00, Paul's fundraising manager sent out a routine plea for donations. A little later, someone on RonPaulForums.com suggested that we all try to beat the Huckabites on the day of their money bomb.

Sora and I had a fun time watching the contest at RonPaulGraphs.com. The Paul donations line suddenly started climbing. In the first four hours, Paul supporters gave him another $150,000. Four minutes before 7:00 PM, they passed Huckabee, and left him in the dust:

(Click for a larger image)

As all this was going on, the Huckabee campaign sent out an email to their supporters, with a link to this graph, urging them not to let Paul's followers rain on their parade. In response, RonPaulGraphs added two links at the top of the blog, for the benefit of any Huckabee supporters who arrived at the page: the YouTube video that I blogged below, and a Salon.com article critical of Huckabee's ethics. Final approximate score for the day: Huckabee $$225,000, Ron Paul $250,000. (And the beat-down continues as of this posting. After midnight, Huckabee's upward trend tapered off, while Ron Paul kept climbing. As of 8:00 this morning, Huckabee's donations for the 21st were around $10K; Paul had more than $30K.)

Amusingly enough, the Huckabee campaign celebrated their big night with a video accompanied by the song "Nobody Does It Better."

Nary a word about all this from the mainstream media. Their blackout of Paul continues. Let us just hope that some miracle occurs and the results in Iowa or New Hampshire force them to give him their attention.

Just why DO the talking heads at Fox think Ron Paul gets more money than Huckabee? There couldn't be any correlation between the number of dollars and the number of supporters, could there? Nooooo. The polls (of a few hundred people who voted in the Republican primaries four years ago) show Huckabee ahead. The Fox article closes with this:
But Paul, who leans libertarian in his ideology and is strongly anti-war, has not yet caught fire in the polls the way Huckabee has.
Golly gee, Wally! I wonder why that is. Maybe if you ask people who liked the Neocons four years ago whether they like another Neocon now, you're going to get the answer you hope for.
Posted by Matt at 8 : 26 am | Leave a note {1}
November 20 2007
HUCKABEE HISTORY AND MATH
Mike Huckabee, in the Florida GOP debate, stated that
When our founding fathers put their signatures on the Declaration of Independence, those 56 brave people, most of whom, by the way, were clergymen, they said that we have certain inalienable rights given to us by our creator, and among these life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, life being one of them. I still believe that.
That claim didn't jive with what I taught my class out of Paul Johnson's History of the American People, or with what I'd read in George Grant. So, does anyone care to guess how many ordained clergy were signers of the Declaration of Independence?

The answer is on this page.
Posted by Matt at 11 : 35 pm | Leave a note {1}
MIKE HUCKABEE ON TAXES
It is disappointing to me that many Christian conservatives are supporting Mike Huckabee's presidential campaign. I found this YouTube video revelatory:

Posted by Matt at 9 : 32 pm | Leave a note {1}
Return to journal home

View archived entries